Thursday, February 22, 2007

Tactical Media Group Minutes 2/21/07 (taken by Jay)

Syllabus is updated with more schedule information on Fred’s blog. Please review.

http://fredjohnson.mwg.org/telecom/?page_id=25

Presentation requirements were discussed. Everyone is required to do a presentation to the group. Volunteers are needed for the list below with the tentative dates; more will be forth coming.

  • Policy Summary (3/7/07?)
  • Strategic Planning and Campaigning (3/14/07?)
  • Policy Update (4/4/07?)
  • Community Media Models; Public vs. Community (4/11/07?)
  • Policy Update (4/25/07?)

Project Requirements were discussed. Everyone is required to do an individual project and participate in a collaborative project with other group members. We will continue to discuss project opportunities and people are encouraged to bring their ideas forward. Three collaborative projects that are currently being discussed are below with interested participants tentatively identified.

  • Collaborative Media Project. First meeting Thursday March 1, 2007 5:00 – 7:00.
    1. Aaron
    2. Maria Luisa
    3. Sam
    4. Steve
    5. Cisco
  • Video Production Workshops
    1. Angela
    2. Maria Luisa
    3. Yanno
    4. Sam
    5. Peter
    6. Denai
    7. Joseph
    8. Aaron
    9. Jay
  • Alliance for Community Media Activist Project

Fred is looking for volunteers for this project. Phone surveys, Research and dissemination of findings to rally support. Project will attempt dispel misrepresentation competition on cable pricing. The project will advocate for community control over franchise agreements and right of way issues.

  • Video Uploading and Blogging Workshops

Provide workshops for uploading video to internet services like youtube and bliptv.

We would like to schedule some screenings throughout the semester. Anyone who as video projects to share is encouraged to schedule a viewing. Videos five minutes or so can be viewed during our regular meeting time otherwise we could schedule a special viewing and optional invite the public. Looking for topics relevant to the media topics we’ll be discussing this semester.

  • 2/28/07 - Turn it on, Tune it in, Take it over

FYI – There is a media conference at MIT this Saturday 2/24/07 (Beyond Broadcast). Jason is going and anyone interested should speak with him.

Remember about reading assignments. We will continue to discuss the reading in the coming weeks. Read the intro and first two chapters. Consider key concepts and any questions you have.

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Class Minutes February 7, 2007

(Taken by Jay)

Housekeeping

Introductions

Everyone had an opportunity to introduce themselves. Welcome to all new Tactical Media Group Members.

Facilitator and Note Taker

Jay took notes tonight and will coordinate a signup list for future meetings.

Steve facilitated tonights meeting

Seqouia will take notes next week and Aaron will facilitate next weeks meeting.

Handout

Fred gave a handout for discussion topics

Fred’s Blog

http://fredjohnson.mwg.org/telecom/

Web2.0 and Collaborative Media

Jason led a discussion and presented information about web2.0 and collaborative media. Topics included the following.

  • Efficient use of technology and online communications
  • History of communication = Mass media (Movies, TV, Radio) = More ability to communicate
= Internet (Web1.0) = More people, advanced technology

= Web2.0 = More interactive, new ways for community building, new ways for social networking, advanced technology including open source

  • Technology used to receive information of interest. How to configure your Firefox browser and RSS feeds (Help/customization/themes and extensions/mozilla updates).
  • Technology used to organize your information on the web and connect with others that have like interests. http://del.icio.us/

Reading Assignment

Read introduction and first two chapters of assigned book. Link to book on Fred’s Blog/syllabus

Brief Discussion about Workshops and Projects

We discuss further next week and start scheduling. Fred discussed the requirements of individual projects and expectations of people getting involved outside of the Wednesday night meeting.

Friday, February 09, 2007

Free Josh Wolf Wiki

Friday, February 02, 2007

Friday, December 08, 2006

Along with the Aliance for Community Media, I would encourage everyone to notify the FCC and speak out about their attempt to circumvent congress!

Four Steps to Being Heard

Below are the actions which we would ask that you take by 5 PM EST Wednesday, December 13th. We hope that you will take all of the actions, but understand fully how busy you may be. Therefore, we have listed the actions in order of importance and effect.

Step 1

Call each of the FCC commission offices using the attached script as-is or modified as needed.

Step 2

File your official record of the call(s). This is called “Notice of ex parte meeting” and goes into the official record. Web address is listed in instructions below.

Step 3

With one click, you can email your ex parte letter and comments to the FCC and Congress using our auto-mailer linked to the Alliance home page www.alliancecm.org.

Step 4

Fax a copy of the same ex-parte letter to your three Congress members.

[Note: The multiple exposures to our message are intentional.]


The attached support materials have all of the text and instructions you need. However, if there is anything unclear to you, please feel free to email or call any of the following Public Policy members:


Alan Bushong alan@cctvsalem.org 503.588.2288

Anthony Riddle raiseeveryvoice@yahoo.com 202.393.2650

Carl Kucharski carl@pcmtv.org 503.528.2244

Cor Wilson cwilson@ctv15.org 651.482.1261

Rob Brading rbrading@mctv.org

Rob McCausland rghm@verizon.net

Sean McLaughlin seanm707@yahoo.com

Sue Buske sue@buskegroup.com 916.441.6277

Tony Vigue ctam@usa.net 207.767.7615


Step 1: Call the FCC

[Estimated Time: 2 minutes per call]

We want large numbers of short calls. You are not asked to be experts, merely to weigh in on the matter of video franchising and PEG. This will likely take less than two minutes. When you call, you will likely be referred to voicemail. Whether you get voicemail or are graced with a real conversation, the script is the basically the same. This is a formal process, so it is okay to read from a script. Feel free to make it fit your needs. It’s your call. They have to listen.


Hello, my name is [Name]. I am [Title/Relationship] for [Organization or Community] located in [City and State].

I am calling about MB 05-311 on video franchising. The following are our concerns:

We unite with Alliance for Community Media members in calling for competition without destruction of local, community controlled media.

1) The proposed rule eliminates incentive for providers to negotiate in good faith. If the city and the provider do not come to agreement in 90 days, the new provider can proceed without agreement. They can then make billions of dollars in our public land without considering local needs.

2) The proposed rule lacks a remedy for geographic discrimination. Public, Education and Government Access, or PEG, are tools to engage our local communities in democracy. Democratic participation should be for all, not based on a company business rule.

3) The proposed rule reduces the support for PEG, institutional networks and other in-kind services from that allowed by current Federal law. It is in direct contradiction to language written by the telephone companies and already passed in key states. This reduction would eliminate a valued community resource with no demonstrated effect on either price or competition.

4) The changes being proposed are dramatic and over-step the FCC’s authority. We believe that such changes to the law should be made by Congress, not the FCC. These changes will slow competition by confusing the legal framework. Changes to the law should be decided by law-makers, not the FCC.

I can be reached at [Phone or Email]. Thank you for your consideration.

###

Commissioner

Media Aide

Phone Number

MacDowell

Christina Pauze (paw-ZAY)

202-418-0144

Tate

Chris Robbins

202-418-2500

Chairman Martin

Heather Dixon

202-418-1000

Adelstein

Rudy Brioche (bree-o-SHAY)

202-418-2300

Copps

Bruce Gottlieb

202-418-2000


Step 2: Filing an Official Call Record (Ex Parte)

[Estimated Time: 5 Minutes]

1) Cut and paste the letter below into a blank Word, WordPerfect or PDF document. It may be completely blank or may be electronic stationery. Save.

2) Fill in and edit as appropriate.

3) Go to the filing page: http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

4) Fill out the cover sheet information, including:

a. #1: fill in “05-311”

b. #11: do check box

c. #12: pull menu down to “notice”

5) In the green section, type “ex parte notice” for file description.

6) In the green section, use “Browse” button to attach your letter file.

7) In the green section, use pull down menu to identify letter format.

8) Hit Send. [Note: Correspondence is appropriately addressed to “Secretary” Dortch.]

9) Done!

###

[Date]


Ex Parte

Ms. Marilyn Dortch, Secretary

Federal Communications Commission

445 12th Street, S.W.

Washington, DC 20554

Re: Implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, MB Docket No. 05-311

Dear Ms. Dortch,

This notice is to record our ex parte meeting(s) with [FCC Commissioners or staff names]. We stated our concerns [directly via phone or via voicemail] on [date(s)]. Our comments are summarized as follows:

We unite with Alliance for Community Media members in calling for competition without destruction of local, community controlled media.

1) The proposed rule eliminates incentive for providers to negotiate in good faith. If the city and the provider do not come to agreement within 90 days, the provider can proceed without an agreement. They can then make billions of dollars using our public land without considering local needs. This framework would be unreasonable.

2) The proposed rule lacks a remedy for geographic discrimination. Public, Education and Government Access, or PEG, are tools to engage our local communities in democracy. Democratic participation should be for all, not based on a company business rule. The public-right-of-way is owned by all in our community, not just those in an area lucky enough to be served. We believe that inevitable market imbalances must be anticipated by the FCC, as they were by Congress, and that any rule-making must provide these three elements:

A) A standard for identifying imbalances in service.

B) A party responsible for identifying the imbalance—logically, the municipality.

C) A means for prevention or remedy of the imbalance.

3) The proposed rule reduces the support for PEG or other community media services from what is allowed by current Federal law. We believe this is an arbitrary reduction which will hurt our communities. It is in direct contradiction to language authored by telephone companies and already passed in key states such as California and Texas. This reduction would eliminate a valued community resource with no demonstrated effect on either subscriber price or level of competition.

4) The changes being proposed to the law are dramatic. We believe that such changes to the law should be made by Congress, not the FCC. These changes will slow competition by confusing the legal framework. Such changes should be decided by law-makers, not the courts. The FCC should not usurp Congressional authority.

We look forward to working with the FCC to establish a process which supports both competition and community fairness. Please contact us if you have questions or comments.

Sincerely,


[Your Name]

[Your Title and/or Affiliation]

[Street Address]

[City, State Zip]

[Phone]

[Email Address]

CC: Christina Pauze

Chris Robbins

Heather Dixon

Rudy Brioche

Bruce Gottlieb

My Congressional Delegation


Step 3: Email copies to your Congressional delegation.

[Estimated time: 2 Minutes]

With one click, you should email your ex-parte letter or other comments to the FCC and Congress using our auto mailer at:

http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/ACM/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=6173.


This direct link is also posted on the Alliance home page.

All you have to do is cut and paste your letter from Step 2 above into our easy auto-mailer. It will go automatically to your Senators and Representative.

Step 4: Fax a copy of the same letter to your Congress delegation.

[Estimated time: 5 Minutes]

Fax a copy of the same ex-parte letter to your three Congress members. A physical document in the office is more powerful than email alone.

The current fax numbers will follow on separate email and will be posted on Alliance website, thereafter. We will issue a similar document for the new, 110th Congress when available.

[Note: The multiple exposures to our message are intentional.]

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Dear Tactical Media People,

Here are the notes from our November 16th meeting:

Charlotte says: Update on projects is tonights discussion.
Fred says: Discussion of announcements involving due dates, and questions:
1.Do we need to make any corrections for this class (issues anyone)?
2.Why aren't we focusing on national policies at all?
3.Steve says: When are the screenings going to happen? Matt L.'s Screening is happening December 14th. Everyone needs to meet here at 5:30 PM.
Other screenings maybe in the next semester.

Updates:

Jay has a ready color-printed flier for the Video Workshop date and events.

Pam says: The dates and times and the room are reserved for the Video Workshop.

Party: People are talking about having our social party at the Double-Tree Guest Suites near Umass Boston.

Due Dates IMPORTANT so in everything is in bold:

Note: First, sign up on the Tactical Media Wiki! Jason will help you out with this.

Post the definitions that we've been talking about (on the handouts sheet) by: December 7th, 2006.
Fred wants to see everyone's definitions of the terms (everyone's individual definition of each term) on the Tactical Media Wiki.
Jonell is going to have information up on the Tactical Media Wiki in a seperate category from the terms, by: November 30th, 2006.
Everyone should make corrections, arguments, or additions of each others submissions. These should not be made in the same place as the Dec. 7th definitions, they should be commented on in a separate place on the Wiki which the Wiki group will create for all of us. AND everyone, together, should come up with a definition of what Community Media means and post that on a separate place on the Wiki by: December 14th, 2006.
Read Chapters 1 and 2 in the book and put up 3 critical questions that you have from the reading on the Tactical Media Wiki by: Next class, November 30th, 2006 please.

Enrollment (registration for classes) opens on November 27th , 2006. You need to register by January 1st, 2007 to avoid the late fee. On January 18th, classes will be canceled that don't have enough students that are enrolled in them.

Friday, November 10, 2006

Tactical Media Minutes for November 9, 2006
Notes: Steve
Facilitator: Charlotte

AGENDA
1)Housekeeping
2)Group project report
3)Discussion on election and its implications for communications policy

HOUSEKEEPING
-Please see Jay for notes/facilitation sign-up to ensure that we have folks filling the two roles for the remainder of the semester.
-Reality check: next week we will take 20-30 minutes to assess where we stand both collectively and individually given that the semester is winding down.
-Reminder: CMT students have priority use of the video/editing room. It is a good idea to familiarize oneself with its resources.
http://www.cmt-vmr.blogspot.com/
>Sign-up to use the room for extended time periods and check out equipment with Peter Adams. There will be a potential competency available for conducting and documenting a full video/editing room inventory (see Fred).
-Be sure to read the first two chapters of the class text Community Media: A Global Perspective by Ellie Rennie. This is a prelude to the Media and Community Building Competency.

GROUP PROJECT REPORTS
-Collaborative Media/Wiki Group
>little to report as things are moving slowly
>basic introduction to the wiki is complete and more substantive instruction will commence next week.
-Video Production Group
>Dates: November 30 and December 7 are solid. Hours are 3pm to 5pm.
>the Taylor Center is reserved for the event.
>insertion in the Mass Media calender is in process as well as the flyer promoting the event.
>Jay will have a to-do list up on the blog.
-Screening
>Matt Landry and co. will be presenting a documentary on citizen journalism on December 14 in the Taylor Center from 630-730pm. Please specify if anone has issue with extended time slot that Matt requested. The documentary is only 14 minutes long and will be followed by a Q&A period.
-Future Project
>all in the Tactical Media Group will be required to do an independent project that Fred will detail next week in terms of possibilities.
>here is on option(to be done preferrably this semester by up to 2 students).
>>Research who the new communications policy leaders are, post-election, at both the state and federal levels. Then discuss the potential shift in policy. Fred and Jason will lend support. Jonell has expressed interest. If anyone else is interested they should speak with Fred.
ELECTION AND IMPLICATIONS
-we had an open dialogue on election results and what the various thoughts were. If you haven't done so, read Jason's op-ed in the Mass Media entitled, Thoughts on Election Day.
-Here are some of the topics flying around the Taylor Center during our interchange of opinions.
>Whose right? Whose left?
>>Don't be too quick in categorizing Democrats as the keepers of the progressive faith. Some indeed are, while others may offer up some surprises.
>The failure of Question #2
>>fusion voting, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fusion
>>list voting, http://www.fairvote.org/pr/whatis.htm
>>the inherent kink in the american electoral process(in addition to slander campaigns and voter intimidation and psychotic state differentiated voting processes) is the barrier to initiating a party. The parliamentary system significantly differs in that parties are easier to start and are represented in accordance to the respective percentage of votes won.
>The Progressive Era, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Era
>What do voters consider important when voting for a particular candidate?
>>issues possibly, however, personality and looks are crucial factors that often transcend issues.
>Why did Deval win?
>>did he play it safe?
>>did he stay away from from "heavy" issues and intuit the weakness of Healey both on issues as well as aesthetics?
>The Kennedy/Nixon Debate of 1960, http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/K/htmlK/kennedy-nixon/kennedy-nixon.htm
>The new role of federal legislation
>>policy changes may be forthcoming as different appointees present different perspectives on the issues at hand(ex. Stevens Bill)
>>federal legislation may in fact transform itself towards a more favorable climate in terms of the public interest and thus therfore change the strategy of those involved in media activism.
I found this Free, Interactive Course in Studio and Field Production ! I have only reviewed the site, but it looks pretty good. Thought people might be inerested in it.

Thursday, November 09, 2006

Notes for 11/2/06
Facilitator-Jay Cleary
Notes-Pam Ross
We welcomed a guest to the meeting, Nicole Agusti, who is in the Public Policy Graduate Program with Jason.
First on the agenda was an update of projects being planned by Tactical Media Group. Charlotte gave the overview of our meeting for the Video Production workshop, which included Bruce Lundeen, Steve, Jay, Charlotte, Pam and Yianno. It is being planned as a two parter, first on Nov.30th from 3-5PM to cover production techniques and hands on experience with equipment. The second workshop, possibly on Dec.7th, will cover storytelling and editing techniqe. Group assignments: Steve will check out reserving the space for workshop, Jay will work on the flyer, Charlotte will contact the newspaper for advertising, and Pam will get a list of CMT students from Fred so that we can get them involved for their video production competency if they need it.
Fred wants us to define our audience and decide if we will keep it on campus, set limits for attendence and set up an RSVP on list serve.
Jason held a meeting for the Collaborative Media project with Guled in attendence. There is some conflict in meeting times for projects, limiting attendence, so Jason suggested we set them up to be at different times, in case same people want to be involved in both. The plan is to set up our own WIKI contain community media info and definition that we can then contribute to Wikipedia, as of yet there are no defnitions for comunity media, only refers to public access. Jason will check out the necessary software, interfaces, etc. Sequoia located a server we can use if needed.
Guled had info re: tactica media @ wikispaces.com-- temp. username :tacticalmedia
password: tactical if you want to go and check it out.
Second item; Scheduling. Steve has been in contact w/ Matt re: the short documentary done at CCTV, wants to screen for our class and Fred would like to see us open it up to public as well. Steve will talk to Matt again re: his availability. Dec.7 is a possibility.
Fred asked if anyone is interested in writing articles for Mass Media; possible topics would be net neutrality, policy. Jason and Fred discuss if writings should be op-eds or as a column, should meet academic standards and would meet competency requirements.
Clarification re: competencies from Fred: Multimedia class next semester with Nettrice Gaskin should be taken by CMT majors. Competencies will be met if we participate in projects, post to blog, participate in discussion. There are four all together and can be achieved over two semesters. Fred will be asking us to do some specific assignments from Community Media book and we should be getting our definitions together as noted in curriculum outline on Fred's blog. These will be included on our wiki and possibly then contributed to Wikipedia. He would like to present this at Media Reform conference that he will attend in Memphis in January. Watch for changes and assigments in Fred's syllabus.
Policy: we updated Fred about where we went in discussion week prior in his absence. That info is posted in notes from that week. In addition we talked about following movement of policy when comes up next session in Congeress; U.S. lack of broadband speed and quality as compared to Japan, etc. and what will happen in future if Verizon/Comcast type Duopoly prevents free internet, would it ever go private. Jason mentions China's attempt to censor content, will they be able to do it or not? Something to watch for future.
Gather and include more info on Intellectual Property/Copyright, Key Concepts and Policy for Wiki.
Jason presented maps from Boston Wireless Task Force that he found @ Boston.gov/wireless showing where and what type of cable is already in place around the city. Questions were who owns and controls what and what will be done with in future. Articles can be found on "Wireless in Boston" from Mayor's Task force at that website. Talked briefly at end of class about "dumb network, big pipes" meaning fast broadband, cheap, free, fast for everyone, basically the opposite of net neutrality.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Tactical Media Communication Policy Notes
10-19-06
Fred Johnson

Public Interest and the Media
- Thinking about impact on community
- Politics
- Democracy
- Diversity of ideas/culture

Political Philosophy: Radical <-->Liberal – not all that useful, recall Jason’s remarks. Very valuable way of understanding communication policy debates with the current heavy emphasis on “libertarianism.”

Democratic
+
Individual +++ Collective
+
Totalitarian


Terms of the debate:
Conservative – think market will figure it out
Liberal --- Regulation and Reform in the public interest while allowing corporations to thrive
Radical – Public ownership
Monopolies vs Market

Monopolies DON’T:
- innovate
- diverse
- do the unpopular
- share
- price competitively
+ they sell services at a low price to kill smaller competitors, then jack up prices (price gouging)

Points of view
- corporate
- regulatory
- consumer affairs – ask if PEG access raises rates

Two other ways to view the policy discussion:
- Media Culture: Issues like access and representation, current affairs programming.
- Infrastructure Development

Media Policy – Levels of Regulation:
1.-Federal
2.-State
3.-Local (county/municipality)
4.-GAT (global, formerly WTO) *new

Media Policy Venues or sites
1.-Courts
2.-Legislative Bodies
3.-Administrative bureaucracy
4.-International????

Regulatory Categories (based on type of software; differences in business models & computer management):
- Broadcasting
- Cable
- Telephony
- Internet

Emerging Issues:
1. Copyright
2. Definition of communication service vs. cable service (Title 1 & 2)
3. Must carry
A FCC regulation requiring that cable TV systems must carry all locally-licensed television stations. This was done to prevent cable from destroying free over-the-air television.
elastic demand for cable keep prices high and censor local stations
4. General Public License (GPL) agreement
a. Open source and free distribution
b. Creative Commons
5. WIFI (or now WIMAX)
6. Public ownership / monopoly
a.The Shell Game
7. Broadband over powerlines


Key Concepts in Communication Policy

Net Neutrality

-Maintaining the free flow of digital information on the internet; open and equal access for all
Concentration of ownership/ Duopoly
-Any marketplace where consumer choice is limited to two service providers
-Cable and DSL providers control almost 98% of the marketplace
Digital Divide

-Gap between communities in their access and knowledge of technology
- Tied to educational and economic restraints
Access to Internet, Broadcast
-Assistive Technology
-Web content accessibility
Public Interest
-Community Programming

-Community Media
Copyright Law, Intellectual Property Rights